Gloriana Nahum vs Maria Berlanga Bandera Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 09:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Nahum vs M. Berlanga Bandera

BEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nahum 0 - 1 Bandera
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gloriana Nahum winning 0 and Maria Berlanga Bandera winning 2. The last match between Maria Berlanga Bandera and Gloriana Nahum was at the W35 Norman, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Maria Berlanga Bandera getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nahum | 0 |
| Bandera | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Norman(10-22-25)
G. Nahum vs M. B. Bandera H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.04% (29-17) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (18-18) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Nahum vs M. B. Bandera Match Preview:
- On their second serve, Gloriana Nahum has outperformed with a win rate of 37.50% compared to Maria Berlanga Bandera's 29.70%. Could this give Nahum an edge?
- In return games, Nahum captures 55.60% of points on opponents' second serves, consistently outperforming Berlanga Bandera's 51.38%.
- Nahum's first serve return performance is stronger at 42.82%, compared to Berlanga Bandera's 31.96%, a significant aspect for forecasting the H2H outcome.
- Saving breakpoints is another area where Nahum excels with a rate of 48.54%, compared to Berlanga Bandera's 25.00%, which could make Nahum better under pressure.
- Nahum has a higher annual win percentage of 72.73% versus Berlanga Bandera's 66.67% over the past year, indicating a consistent form.
- Both players show their best surface win percentage on Hard courts at 68%, making them evenly matched in terms of surface preference.
- Nahum has won 76.47% of matches mostly in lower-tier events, while Berlanga Bandera has a 66.67% win rate in higher-tier events, reflecting different levels of competition faced.
- Nahum's opponents had an average rank of 278, whereas Berlanga Bandera faced slightly stronger competition with an average rank of 216.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Nahum has an unbeatable record (100%) over the past year, providing a potential advantage in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
In their recent performances, Gloriana Nahum demonstrates a slight edge over Maria Berlanga Bandera, especially in second serve efficiency and return games.
While both players excel on Hard courts, Nahum's consistent ability to save breakpoints and handle pressure situations better gives her a potential advantage.
Despite facing opponents with a higher average ranking, Berlanga Bandera’s experience in upper-tier events can't be overlooked. However, Nahum's perfect record in deciding sets may prove decisive in a closely contested match.
Based on these comparisons, Gloriana Nahum is projected as the most likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Gloriana Nahum vs Maria Berlanga Bandera Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Nahum vs M. B. Bandera H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:41 | Average Match Time | 1:17:41 |
| 82% (50/61) | 1st Serve % | 79% (45/57) |
| 46% (23/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (31/45) |
| 27% (3/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (6/12) |
| 40% (23/57) | Return Points Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Nahum Recent Matches Played
M. B. Bandera Recent Matches Played

G. Nahum vs M. B. Bandera Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.04% (29/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (18/18) |
| 55.24% (58/47) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.22% (42/40) |
| 51.48% (504/475) | Games Win/Loss | 50.13% (384/382) |
| 65.63% (21/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 36.36% (4/7) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 13 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 136 | Total Double Faults | 54 |
| 1:35:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 347.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 249.53 |
| 78% (1973/2536) | 1st Serve % | 65% (668/1033) |
| 53% (1047/1973) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (379/668) |
| 39% (219/563) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (154/365) |
| 48% (170/352) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (60/115) |
| 48% (1211/2531) | Return Points Win % | 44% (455/1037) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Challenger W/L | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 65.79% (25/13) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 64% (29/45) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (14/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 100% (21/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (18/15) |
| 0% (21/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (18/3) |
| 32% (25/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (18/3) |